In Her Skin (2011) - Rotten Tomatoes

In Her Skin2011

In Her Skin (2011)





Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

In Her Skin Photos

Movie Info

This is a true story: It's what every parent fears: their child not coming home when they're meant to. On the evening of March 1st, 1999 Rachel Barber, a fifteen year old student, doesn't climb off the tram to meet her dad, Mike. Elizabeth, her mother, and Mike bolt into action. This simple action-not coming home on time-is totally out of character. Something had gone wrong-something bad had happened to their daughter. Caroline Reed is nineteen and overwhelmed with self-hatred. Writing to her parents that she should have been aborted, she looks in the mirror and sees a fat, ugly, pimply, dirty misfit. Nobody likes her, least of all her father who ignores the barrage of mail she sends-a letter a day. Once Rachel's babysitter, Caroline has found an alter-ego that seems to fit neatly into what she wants to be: pretty, "a free-wheeling spirit", a confident, happy girl, a ballet dancer, the grand-daughter of famous Melbourne author, Ivan Southall. Caroline begins to stalk Rachel, noting her clothes, her movements. She applies for a new birth certificate. In Rachel's name-but with her address. Days roll by-a week passes. Elizabeth loses twenty kilos. Mike turns grey. Manni can't function. Almost two weeks later, a computer analyst with Missing Persons; DePyle, sees one of the posters on his way to work. Touched by the desperate effort of the parents he commences his own private investigation... it can't be official; there's no foul play. Will this crew unravel the mystery of Rachel's disappearance when the police are unwilling to? -- (C) IFC Films

Watch it now


Guy Pearce
as Mike Barber
Miranda Otto
as Elizabeth Barber
Ruth Bradley
as Caroline Red Robertson
Sam Neill
as David Reid
Kate Bell
as Rachel Barber
Jack Finsterer
as Patterson
Paul Denny
as Paramedic
Damien Garvey
as Box Hill Cop
Stephen Jenkins
as Richmond Cop
Claude Minisini
as Missing Persons Boss
Delaware North-Cavanaugh
as Cate, 8 Years Old
Sally Christie
as Ashleigh-Rose, 11 Years Old
Amber Ivers
as Rachel, 11 Years Old
Karen Elayna Price
as Shoe Shop Keeper
Ross Macrae
as Fireman
Patrice Fidgeon
as News Reporter
Andrew Blain
as Waddell
Shayler Conder
as Chrissy, 13 Years Old
Paris Morrissey
as Ashleigh-Rose, 8 Years Old
Lily Sinclair
as Rachel, 8 Years Old
Dana Harry
as Heather, 5 Years Old
Toni Forrest
as Heather, 9 Years Old
Karen Pert
as Accountant
Dena Kaplan
as Pregnant Girl with Pram
Tim Boyle
as Policeman #4
Dan Purdy
as Missing Persons Cop
Dan Purdey
as Missing Persons Cop
John Wonnacott
as Missing Persons Cop
Deborah Knight
as News Reader
View All

Critic Reviews for In Her Skin

All Critics (4) | Top Critics (1)

The first red flag is the opening title card, which reads "This is a true story." The use of "is" rather than "based on" or "inspired by" is a harbinger of the lack of perspective and humility that enables the film's most egregious excesses.

February 10, 2011 | Rating: C-
Top Critic

The unpleasant narrative makes for a disturbing but not a good drama.

July 24, 2016 | Rating: C- | Full Review…

It's on the sloppy side, but the primary textures of alarm are sustained and sharply performed, making for a gut-wrenching viewing experience with a foundation in reality that's too awful to bear.

June 12, 2011 | Rating: B- | Full Review…

The makers of In Her Skin must be prepared to cut a check to anyone who ever read, wrote, made, or saw The Lovely Bones.

February 12, 2011 | Rating: 1.5/4 | Full Review…

Audience Reviews for In Her Skin

The acting is terrifyingly bad, it's just so hard to watch these morons obviously are not impatient about finding out their daughter's whereabouts. Despite being inspired by a true story, the film is still very uninventive and boring. This low budget thriller proves films based on true stories can be really dull.

Sylvester Kuo
Sylvester Kuo

Super Reviewer


If it's true that the director claims "the film was made to give Rachel back her voice", I highly doubt that statement. It's more about Caroline than Rachel. And that's fine, but the pretense is offensive (just like a critic pointed out as to disguising the movie out as a true story rather than based on a true story). Apparently, the movie would have been boring had it been only about Rachel's "life", and not focusing on how she met her fate. A chilling story that's not so well told. The performances are okay, and the movie too could have been fine had they tried to tell the story more genuinely than relying more on technical expertise. Overall, just about watchable.

familiar stranger
familiar stranger

Super Reviewer

Not a terrible movie. Just one that, unfortunately considering its based on a real event, isn't structurally sound nor is it that well written in some regards. And the ending is just absolutely shit in the sense that it almost tries to justify Caroline's actions by having her, for the first time in the movie, feeling good about herself at the end of the movie. The last shot is of Caroline looking better than ever smiling at the sky. What the fuck???? I don't know who decided to go with that as the ending, but they're completely retarded. At least switch the stuff around, have the Caroline stuff air BEFORE the family has the funeral, so there's that impact of what her actions have caused Rachel's family to go through, to at least give it some emotional weight. Having the Caroline scene at the prison last is just completely senseless and it takes away from what the movie should've really been about at the end and that's how, in a way, the family was driven closer together because of this madwoman's actions. Don't have the movie end with the killer feeling happy about her current situation. How incredibly stupid of them. Other than that, unfortunately, the movie isn't that well written so it almost feels like an above average TV movie. It feels like a movie you'd see on Lifetime and not something you'd actually pay to see. The movie is basically three stories in one: the family's side of her disappearance, the murderer's side of the events, and Rachel's side. And this is where the movie really falls apart, these segments on their own just don't gel at all. It's understandable that you'd like to get as much of the real story across, but at least do so if you know what you're doing. The movie has no flow, one scene you could be watching the parents dealing with the disappearance and the next scene will be Caroline four years prior to the murder. It just didn't mesh well together and that really made the movie a disaster. The reason this movie gets 2 stars is because of Ruth Bradley's performance, she was fantastic with the crap she was given. She was really quite convincing as a person who had SEVERE emotional issues who could lose it at just any moment. To the point that I believe that Ruth must have some pent up frustrations that she got to let out in this role. If it wasn't for her, I don't know how bad this movie would be. I wouldn't even say it would have been bad, because the rest of the cast was decent enough, it was just an incompetently put together movie. But Ruth Bradley was really the highlight of an underwhelming, unfortunately so, movie.

Jesse Ortega
Jesse Ortega

Super Reviewer

In Her Skin Quotes

News & Features