Norm of the North (2016) - Rotten Tomatoes

Norm of the North2016

Norm of the North (2016)



Critic Consensus: A pioneering feat in the field of twerking polar bear animation but blearily retrograde in every other respect, Norm of the North should only be screened in case of parental emergency.

Norm of the North Videos

Norm of the North Photos

Movie Info

A polar bear of many words, Norm's greatest gripe is simple: there is no room for tourists in the Arctic. But when a maniacal developer threatens to build luxury condos in his own backyard, Norm does what all normal polar bears would do...he heads to New York City to stop it. With a cast of ragtag lemmings at his side, Norm takes on the big apple, big business and a big identity crisis to save the day. -- (C) Lionsgate

Watch it now


Bill Nighy
as Socrate
Gabriel Iglesias
as Pablo/Stan
Colm Meaney
as Grandfather
Jess Harnell
as Male Tourist
Debi Derryberry
as Little Girl
Kate Higgins
as Elizabeth
Charlie Adler
as Forebear
Michael McElhatton
as Laurence, the Actor
Salome Jens
as Councilwoman Klubeck
Keith Ferguson
as Human Tourist
Ben Diskin
as Chef Kozawa
Rick D. Wasserman
as Henchman #3
G.K. Bowes
as Female Tourist
Mikey Kelley
as Henchman #2
Rove McManus
as Junior Investor
Dan Gordon
as Nigel/Henchman #1/PA
Nick Shakoour
as Costumed Bear
Eric Price
as Caribou 1 & 2
Ken Jeong
as Mr. Greene
Maya Kay
as Olympia
Emily Polydoros
as Bratty Girl
Max Spitz
as Teen Bear 1
View All

News & Interviews for Norm of the North

Critic Reviews for Norm of the North

All Critics (70) | Top Critics (25)

Norm of the North is a rancid excursion into well-intentioned animated chaos that proves to be an excruciating endurance test no one of sound mind or body should ever attempt to watch, and that includes their children.

August 16, 2016 | Rating: 0.5/4 | Full Review…

With its strangely adult plot about global warming and real estate development and its mediocre animation style, Norm of the North is one to skip.

August 2, 2016 | Rating: 1.5/5 | Full Review…

Plays like a bargain-bin mashup of tropes lifted from Happy Feet, Madagascar, Ice Age et al.

March 20, 2016 | Rating: 2/5 | Full Review…

The eco-message is rather vague, the villain not particularly villainous, and the jokes fall flat.

March 18, 2016 | Rating: 2/5
Top Critic

Cheap and cheerless, Norm's appeal melts faster than the polar ice.

March 17, 2016 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review…

For the tots, the film is blandly inoffensive enough to offer some Saturday afternoon entertainment, but this isn't one of those crossover hits that parents can enjoy just as much as their kids.

January 29, 2016 | Rating: 1.5/4

Audience Reviews for Norm of the North

I have to start off with three things. Number one: don't ask. Number two: Bill Nighy deserves so much fucking better than this. So much more, I'm not even kidding. And, lastly, number three: do you really expect this movie to be any good when ROB SCHNEIDER, of all people, voices the main character. I don't think I'm exaggerating that Rob is, probably, one of the worst comedic actors of the last 20 years. It's not like Chris Rock, where you know that the guy is actually a good stand-up comic, it's just that his track record for picking films haven't been the best. Schneider is just all-around awful and the fact that he's managed to be a success, if it can be called that, just because his friendship with Adam Sandler is one of the great Hollywood tragedies. I'm obviously exaggerating, but if it really wasn't for Adam Sandler throwing this guy bones by giving him roles that are racially insensitive then Rob would have been, rightfully so, forgotten ages ago. With that said, while I thought the voice acting in this film was really substandard, I don't think the film's poor quality can be blamed entirely on the cast. I will admit that they share some of the blame, I'm not gonna deny that, but the story is awfully misguided and genuinely uninteresting and it seems more like an excuse to have sequences where Norm dances for, literally, no reason whatsoever. Or the reason could be that it's a kids' movie and that's what's expected. Not that the film really had much potential to begin with, but it's like they're really not even trying to make a good movie. They're just trying to make something that kids might look at and be amused. Though, with the quality of the animation, which is nonexistent, I can't imagine too many kids really looking at this and thinking that they want to see it because it's colorful and vibrant. Honestly speaking, the animation is terrible. I believe, and I'm confident about this, that the animation in the first Toy Story that came out in 1995, TWENTY-ONE years ago, looks better than this turd. I swear to you that I'm not joking about this. And I realize that that's not a fair comparison. This movie was never gonna have the budget that, even, the original Toy Story did (this movie had an $18 million budget and TS had a $30 million one), much less were they gonna have the budget that Pixar has now. But, and I do think that gives them a slight pass, but not completely. There's just nothing impressive about the animation. It looks generic and uninspired. I'm honestly quite surprised that this movie got, however limited it was, a theatrical release. I can't imagine that Lionsgate believed that they could make a ton of money on this, so why bother putting it out there and spending money on marketing and trailers for a movie that had limited potential for major success. The film does have some moments where it made me chuckle. Like the lemmings playing the violins as the boat they were on was going down. I think it was mostly how unexpected it was as opposed to it being legitimately funny, but it, at least, got a laugh out of me and that's really the only one I can remember. Is this movie worse than Cars 2, Shrek 3, Shark Tale? I guess if you look at the ratings for those respective films when compared to this one, then yes, this would, technically speaking, be a worse movie. Did it have me as fuming as Cars 2 did? No. I know for a fact that I hated Cars 2 more than I hated this film, that much is obvious. Deep down, this is the worst movie, but I didn't come to hate it as much. I mean, don't get me wrong, I thought this movie was legit awful, but it wasn't the type of awful that made me want to pull my hair out. It's just an awful kids' movie. We get man of those a year and this is just one of them. But, yes, with that said, this is still an awful movie that, hopefully, people stay away from. It's just bad, bad, bad.

Jesse Ortega
Jesse Ortega

Super Reviewer

Not half as bad as most people made out, The story will be a little hard to understand for young children, But beneath the plot is a innocent story that my 4 year old enjoyed even though most of the jokes are twerking polar bears, I can't comment on the 3D as I watched the 2D version, It's nothing memorable or great plus there's much better animations about but you can't knock it for trying something different even if the end result is very under par.

Jamie Clarke
Jamie Clarke

Super Reviewer


Norm of the North consistently underestimates how smart children can be and settles for a lazy, and rather sexist environmental tale that suffers from dull animation and a slapped together plot. Characters rely on pee jokes, that sort of thing. The message isn't a bad one, but the film delivers it in a loud and unsubtle way. January is characterized by crappy animations and luckily Kung Fu Panda 3 and Zootopia weren't too far behind. A poor way to start 2016 in animation. Rating: 27

Bradley J
Bradley J

Super Reviewer

Norm of the North Quotes

News & Features