Critic Consensus: Trolls brings its instantly recognizable characters to the big screen in a colorful adventure that, while geared toward the younger set, isn't without rewards for parents.
Watch it now
as King Peppy
as Bergen Guard
as Princess Poppy
as King Gristle
as DJ Suki
as King Gristles Sr.
as Aspen Heitz
as Bini Troll/Nora Troll
as McKenzie Troll
as Olley Troll
as Guy Diamond
as Moxie Dewdrop
as Grandma Rosiepuff
as Cookie Sugarloaf, Mandy Sparkledust
as Sugar Cookieloaf, Mandy Sparkledust
as Darius/Vinny the Phone/Capt. Starfunkle/Spider/Wedgie Bergen
News & Interviews for Trolls
Critic Reviews for Trolls
Kendrick and Timberlake bring snappy comic timing, even when the dialogue could be wittier. Co-director Walt Dohrn steals the picture as a high-fiving cloud-bro.
I was confident Nicholas Stoller's Storks would take the prize for most obnoxious family entertainment of the year, but Trolls -- another garish, computer-animated comedy -- instantly lowers the bar.
I didn't like it, not at all, and while I'm certain there are kids out there who will undoubtedly feel differently don't expect me to sing a different tune on the matter anytime soon.
One character farts glitter and another poops cupcakes. You could not ask for better in-movie metaphors.
It's reasonably entertaining, with some good musical numbers and at least one goofily endearing performance. But it's also just a little bit all over the place, with a story that often seems like a fairy-tale greatest hits album.
Audience Reviews for Trolls
You know, it's been a while since Pixar made a real masterpiece. Inside Out and Finding Dory were both great, great movies, but there's no denying that, at least to me, it fell short of Pixar's best flicks. Don't even get me started on The Good Dinosaur, a B-team Pixar effort. The last true masterpiece we got from a North American animated movie, to me, was The Lego Movie and it's been three years. And I make the distinction, because there's many great animated films from all over the world that I haven't seen yet. Pixar's main competitor, while a more prolific studio than Pixar, has never had the same stellar reputation. Their filmography is certainly solid, but their brand has always been more about getting as much people to see their movies as possible. Don't get me wrong, Pixar's business model is to bring in as many people as well, but they still put in an A+ effort in trying to tell a strong story with emotional depth. So you come for the comedy, but you stay for the characters and how they're developed. With Dreamworks, it's more the other way around. They're centered more on the comedy and if a great story comes out of that, then so be it, but it's not what they focus on. They've had some really great stories on their hands, like with the How to Train Your Dragon franchise, but since the second installment in that franchise, I don't think Dreamworks has managed to make a great movie since. Perhaps that's just me. Since Dragon 2, I've seen all their movies but two. Those two are The Boss Baby and Captain Underpants, both of which came out fairly recently. The films they've released since then are Penguins of Madagascar, Home, Kung Fu Panda 3 and this one. The best of them all, Kung Fu Panda 3, is only good at best. I don't know what it is about this movie, but it was just peaks and valleys. Let's get this out of the way right now, this is a Dreamworks B-team effort to be sure. I don't know how I can tell, but I can tell. You can just sense the fact that the effort simply isn't as there as it would be in a How to Train Your Dragon or even a Shrek (even though the last two installments in that franchise sucked). I think part of the reason I say this is because of the fact that the film is just so damn colorful and relies so much on musical scenes that use real-life pop songs and not just ones specifically written for this movie, like in Frozen. I don't wanna say that this is a sign of laziness, but it's awfully close to it. I say that because they hope to use pop songs and the colorful visuals in order to distract you from the fact that there's really not much to the actual movie. The Bergens want to eat the Trolls since it's meant to make them happy. Trolls escape, but are found and taken hostage 20 years later by a disgraced Bergen chef. Bergen chef plans to use the Trolls to steal the throne from the king. Would be queen, Poppy, and grouchy Branch go on a journey to save those who were taken. It's not what I would call a great story, or even a good one, but it's what they decided on going with. But, again, they just use the visuals and the music to make up for whatever flaws the film may have had. For whom the movie was intended, a very young crowd, they only care about the happy visuals and the musical numbers. They don't give a shit about story. I think this movie suffers from exactly the same problem that Frozen suffered. It's got way too many damn songs for the story to really shine through. Though, in the case of Frozen, at least the story was pretty strong in the end, even if the great number of musical scenes sabotaged the movie left and right. I think it's the same thing here, even though there's no real story to speak of, so I don't know exactly what it was sabotaging. The film isn't even what I would call to be bad because, as I mentioned earlier, there's peaks and valleys. The film, while not being exactly the most clever under the sun, does still have some entertaining and funny moments. And, while I complained about the animation being bright to distract the kiddies, it's still a solidly animated flick. This is another part of the film that screams B-team, the animation just isn't as strong as it was in the HTTYD franchise. The voice acting is quite good. Anna Kendrick is great as is Justin Timberlake. Say what you will about the guy, but he's turned into a pretty damn good actor. I don't think he's got the depth or range of someone like a Michael Shannon, as an example, but he's still better than most people would give him credit for. Voice acting was never a problem for me in this movie. I really don't know if I would say that this was ok or decent. There's a difference, it might not be by much, but there is one. And I don't know, because giving the film 2 stars feels too low, but giving it 2.5 feels way too generous. I suppose it depends on what you're watching it for. If you're watching it because you want something harmless, bright and happy for your kids, then this would be decent. If you don't have kids and you're just watching it because you like animated films and you want to be actually be entertained and drawn into this world, then I'd say this was ok, at best. If you're looking for something to compete with Pixar's best then you're really just barking up the wrong tree. Though it is better than Cars 2. Seriously, I fucking hated Cars 2. Having said all of that, I've decided to settle on 2 stars. But I honestly think that this is a better movie than the rating implies, it's just a movie that never finds a consistently entertaining tone. Not to mention the pedestrian story and the animation, while solid, not being as strong as one has grown accustomed to. If you want to watch this with your family, then this will be an easy watch and you probably won't think about it ever again after you're done. If you're watching alone, it'll also be an easy watch but you'll have to deal with the flaws and there are quite a bit of them. But, by and large, this is still a fairly harmless and inoffensive movie. Some of you will like this, some of you will not, I can't really give it a recommendation, but it's a fine watch for 90-odd minutes.
It's difficult to not feel indifferent about a movie like Trolls. In the end, it's fine. Is it somewhat offensive in terms of originality and cheap covers of gloriously good pop songs? It could certainly be taken that way, but when taking into consideration the target audience for this latest DreamWorks animated adventure it's hard to get too frustrated with the rote story Trolls tolls out or the advantage it takes in remixing recognizable songs into auto-tuned Kidz Bop versions you could have certainly lived without. Of course, Trolls doesn't mean to offend, but rather it simply means to entertain a fairly wide age range of kiddos while at the same time giving over tried and true lessons that deal in being true to one's self to find true happiness. No, Trolls isn't either a good film or a particularly bad one, but more it is simply one that exists to colorfully distract for an hour and a half only to mostly be forgotten the next day. No harm, no foul. Trolls is ultimately something of a mix between DreamWorks own Shrek series as far as character types go while more or less the same story The Smurfs told us as far as being small creatures who live in peace and harmony while having to battle a much larger being who threatens to eat them among other evil things. There wouldn't be anything necessarily wrong with restructuring these archetypes and plotlines were Trolls interested in doing anything fresh or interesting (and when I say interesting I, obviously, mean weirder) with as much as they've given themselves to work with, but by simply slapping a variety of pop covers throughout rather than going full-on musical and ultimately being more harmless than memorable this movie isn't exactly the kind of product a studio wants to put out if they want to retain any type of credibility. Though it really is difficult to say anything downright terrible about Trolls the bottom line is this was a product made to move merchandise and that it actually turned out as competent and sometimes even as fun as it is shouldn't be forgotten. Sure, one could point out the desperate lengths movie studios are now going to in order to cash in on brands given the troll dolls were first popular in the sixties (with a resurgence in the nineties) or one could point to The LEGO Movie as a film based on toys/superfluous junk that actually turned out rather inspired and great, but somewhere in the middle of those truths and thoughts we find Trolls; just happy to have been given enough room to dance and sing and hug. read the whole review at www.reviewsfromabed.com
Trolls is a neon-tinted explosion of glitter, music and fast-paced humor. It may not be an animated masterpiece but there are some very creative and charming things happening in this film. DreamWorks isn't at the level of challenging Disney or Pixar and they prove it again with their latest, but if Trolls maybe isn't ambitious it's a lot of fun. The animation is lovely to look at. Colorful and tactile with use of felt and scrapbook cutouts, the animation sparkles. The film tells an important if rather basic message about happiness and how it is found within. The first half of the film is delightful with some terrific musical numbers starring Anna Kendrick, however, momentum slows a bit once the trolls hit Bergen Town, and the addition of a sideplot involving a Bergen scullery maid is rather strange, but the film pulls it together near the end. In the film's best scene, resembling Inside Out's Memory Dump scene, Justin Timberlake flexes his vocals in a touching rendition or True Colors and an oddly quiet scene from the typical frenzied DreamWorks' animations. Trolls is a cute story, told well with some good vocal performances and some nice musical numbers. It's loud and frantic at times and it doesn't dig too deep, but it's charming and funny enough to make a pleasant escape from the torturous election season. Rating: 68
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.